Sjoberg Full Deposition Record (2016)

From: Johanna Sjoberg (Deponent)To: Court Record
Full RecordSjoberg DepositionComplete Testimony
DEPOSITION OF JOHANNA SJOBERG Case: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.) Johanna Sjoberg was deposed regarding her experiences with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell during the period she was associated with them. KEY TOPICS: - Recruitment while a college student in Palm Beach - Initial introduction through Maxwell - Activities at Epstein's various properties - Other individuals present at Epstein's residences - Nature of interactions with Epstein and Maxwell - Observations regarding other young women Sjoberg described being recruited under the pretense of a legitimate job and subsequently becoming involved in Epstein's massage and sexual abuse scheme. Her testimony was part of the sealed discovery materials in the Giuffre v. Maxwell civil case and portions were released during the unsealing process. Source: Giuffre v. Maxwell Proceedings Available at: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/

People in This Document

Appearance in a document does not imply wrongdoing.

Part of a Curated Collection

The Epstein Case in 2016

In 2016, the Giuffre v. Maxwell case produced an extraordinary volume of discovery materials. Key depositions were taken, including testimony from Ghislaine Maxwell herself and from witnesses including Juan Alessi and other former employees. Thousands of pages of documents were filed under seal, setting the stage for future unsealing battles. The archive contains extensive materials from this period of intense litigation.

All 2016 documents in the timeline →

Source: Giuffre v. Maxwell Proceedings

This record is archived under Depositions: Sworn deposition transcripts from key witnesses in the Epstein-related court cases.

View original document

Related Archive Paths

DISCLAIMER: All documents presented here are from publicly available court records, government FOIA releases, and official archives. This is an informational archive. Inclusion or mention of any individual does not imply wrongdoing. All persons are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.