Flight Logs: Columbus & Wexner Trips

From: Court Exhibit / Flight ManifestsTo: Public Record — Trial Evidence
Flight LogsColumbus OhioLes Wexner
FLIGHT LOG ENTRIES — COLUMBUS, OHIO ROUTES Aircraft: Boeing 727-31 (N908JE "Lolita Express") and Gulfstream II Period: 1998-2003 Source: Court-Filed Flight Manifests ROUTE SUMMARY: Multiple flight log entries document trips between Jeffrey Epstein's base of operations and Columbus, Ohio — the headquarters of L Brands (formerly The Limited, Inc.) and home of billionaire Les Wexner. EPSTEIN-WEXNER RELATIONSHIP: Les Wexner was Jeffrey Epstein's most significant financial relationship. As the founder and CEO of L Brands (parent company of Victoria's Secret, Bath & Body Works, and The Limited), Wexner entrusted Epstein with broad power of attorney over his financial affairs beginning in the early 1990s. Key aspects of the relationship documented in flight logs and other records: - Regular flights between Epstein's properties and Columbus - Wexner granted Epstein power of attorney over his finances - Wexner transferred his Manhattan townhouse (9 East 71st Street) to Epstein - The relationship ended in 2007, according to Wexner's public statements FLIGHT LOG ENTRIES (Selected): The manifests document passengers and crew on flights routing through Columbus, including: - Business associates and financial advisors - Individuals connected to L Brands operations - Various named and unnamed passengers FINANCIAL CONTEXT: The Epstein-Wexner financial relationship has never been fully explained. Wexner stated publicly in 2019 that Epstein "misappropriated vast sums of money" from him, though no criminal charges were filed. The source of Epstein's wealth remains one of the central mysteries of the case. Source: Court-Filed Flight Manifests / Trial Evidence Available at: https://www.courtlistener.com/

Related Archive Paths

DISCLAIMER: All documents presented here are from publicly available court records, government FOIA releases, and official archives. This is an informational archive. Inclusion or mention of any individual does not imply wrongdoing. All persons are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.