Depo: Lesley Groff: Executive Assistant

From: Court Reporter / Giuffre v. Maxwell DiscoveryTo: U.S. District Court, S.D.N.Y.
DepositionEpstein StaffScheduling Records
DEPOSITION OF LESLEY GROFF Case: Giuffre v. Maxwell, No. 15-cv-7433 (S.D.N.Y.) Date: May 10, 2016 Location: Offices of counsel, New York, New York Lesley Groff served as Jeffrey Epstein's executive assistant for over two decades, managing his scheduling, travel arrangements, and day-to-day coordination at his various properties. KEY TESTIMONY AREAS: SCHEDULING AND VISITOR MANAGEMENT Groff testified about her role in scheduling appointments and visits to Epstein's residences. She maintained calendars and contact lists, coordinated arrivals and departures, and managed communications between Epstein and his various associates. TRAVEL COORDINATION As executive assistant, Groff was involved in coordinating travel on Epstein's private aircraft, including the Boeing 727 and Gulfstream jets. She testified about the process for arranging flights and passenger manifests. KNOWLEDGE OF HOUSEHOLD OPERATIONS Groff was questioned about her knowledge of activities at Epstein's Manhattan townhouse, Palm Beach estate, and other properties. She described her understanding of the household staff structure and massage scheduling. CONTACT WITH YOUNG WOMEN Groff testified about her contacts with various young women who visited Epstein's properties, including her role in providing them with travel arrangements and contact information. Groff was later named as a co-conspirator (though not charged) in federal proceedings. In December 2023, she reached a non-prosecution agreement with federal prosecutors in exchange for cooperation. Source: Giuffre v. Maxwell Discovery / Court Records Available at: https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/4355835/giuffre-v-maxwell/

Related Archive Paths

DISCLAIMER: All documents presented here are from publicly available court records, government FOIA releases, and official archives. This is an informational archive. Inclusion or mention of any individual does not imply wrongdoing. All persons are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.