Government Supplemental Brief on Epstein Grand Jury Release

From: U.S. Department of JusticeTo: U.S. District Court, S.D. Florida, Southern District of New York
Government BriefTransfer RequestPublic InterestEFTA02819488
UNITED STATES' RESPONSE TO ORDER ON SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEFING In re: Grand Jury 05-02 (WPB) and 07-103 (WPB) S.D. Florida, No. 9:25-mc-80920 Filed: July 20, 2025 This supplemental brief answered the court's questions about transfer and unsealing. DOJ first argued that the Florida petition was eligible for transfer to the Southern District of New York under Rule 6(e)(3)(G). The Government's theory was that the petition arose from the public federal prosecution history in New York, including the 2019 Epstein indictment and the later Maxwell criminal trial, and that those proceedings were the only judicial proceedings tied to the requested disclosure. The brief also addressed the underlying request to release the transcripts. DOJ acknowledged the difficulty created by Eleventh Circuit precedent, especially Pitch v. United States, which holds that district courts in that circuit may not disclose grand jury materials outside Rule 6(e)'s enumerated exceptions. At the same time, DOJ argued that other circuits have allowed release in special circumstances involving historical importance and strong public interest. The Government preserved that argument while recognizing that the Florida district court was bound by Eleventh Circuit law. The filing is significant because it shows DOJ's fallback structure. If the Florida court could not itself unseal the materials, DOJ wanted the matter transferred to a court connected to the New York Epstein and Maxwell prosecutions. If the Florida court kept the case, DOJ asked it to treat the extraordinary public interest in Epstein's investigation as sufficient reason to release the records or to preserve the issue for higher-court review. For researchers, this document captures the legal tension before Congress intervened: public transparency was being asserted through ordinary Rule 6(e) procedure, but existing Eleventh Circuit law sharply constrained that path. Source: DOJ Epstein Library / S.D. Fla. Available at: https://www.justice.gov/epstein/files/Court%20Records/In%20re%20Grand%20Jury%2005-02%20%28WPB%29%20%26%2007-103%20%28WPB%29%2C%20No.%20925-mc-80920%20%28S.D.%20Fla.%202025%29/EFTA02819488.pdf

The Epstein Case in 2025

In February 2025, the Justice Department released "Epstein Files: Phase 1", including a flight-log exhibit, a redacted contact book and an evidence list, much of it previously public. After a July 2025 DOJ-FBI memo said no further disclosure was warranted, Reps. Ro Khanna and Thomas Massie introduced the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The House passed it 427-1 on November 18, 2025, it became law on November 19, and it required the Justice Department to publish its Epstein records within 30 days; the first production followed on December 19, 2025.

All 2025 documents in the timeline →

Source: DOJ Epstein Library / S.D. Fla.

This record is archived under Grand Jury: Grand jury proceedings and related documents from the Epstein case.

View original document

Related Archive Paths

DISCLAIMER: All documents presented here are from publicly available court records, government FOIA releases, and official archives. This is an informational archive. Inclusion or mention of any individual does not imply wrongdoing. All persons are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.