Defense Appeal Arguments - Maxwell Brief Citing Juror Misconduct (23-7070)

From: Ghislaine Maxwell (Appellant)To: U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
Defense BriefJuror MisconductVoir Dire Challenge
BRIEF FOR DEFENDANT-APPELLANT\n\nUSA v. Maxwell, No. 23-7070 (2d Cir.)\n\nGhislaine Maxwell appeals her conviction on the following grounds:\n\n1. JUROR MISCONDUCT: Juror 50 failed to disclose during voir dire that he was a victim of childhood sexual abuse, depriving the defendant of her right to an impartial jury.\n\n2. CONSTRUCTIVE AMENDMENT: The superseding indictment constructively amended the charges by adding a sex trafficking count.\n\n3. STATUTE OF LIMITATIONS: Several counts were time-barred.\n\n4. EVIDENTIARY ERRORS: The court admitted prejudicial testimony that should have been excluded.\n\nThe defendant requests that her conviction be vacated and the case remanded for a new trial.\n\nSource: Second Circuit Court Records

People in This Document

Appearance in a document does not imply wrongdoing.

The Epstein Case in 2023

The year 2023 saw the most significant unsealing of Epstein-related documents to date. Judge Preska ordered the release of thousands of pages from the Giuffre v. Maxwell case, revealing over 150 names of individuals connected to Epstein. The Florida grand jury released its final report examining how the criminal justice system failed victims. The Epstein Victims' Compensation Fund completed its work, having distributed over $121 million to approximately 150 survivors.

All 2023 documents in the timeline →

Source: 2d Circuit

This record is archived under Court Filings: Official court filings from Giuffre v. Maxwell and related Epstein proceedings, organized with docket-level context and release chronology.

View original document

Related Archive Paths

DISCLAIMER: All documents presented here are from publicly available court records, government FOIA releases, and official archives. This is an informational archive. Inclusion or mention of any individual does not imply wrongdoing. All persons are presumed innocent unless proven guilty in a court of law.